‘Slap on the wrist’ rejected by ethics panel

For many years, the Florida Commission on Ethics has endured criticism as a "toothless tiger" that doles out gentle punishment for serious violations of the public trust. But developments Friday propose that may be a thing of the past.

In a case involving a prominent South Florida politician, the panel rejected a proposal to slap a $1,000 fine on Broward County Commissioner Diana Wasserman-Rubin for voting to approve applications for county grants written by her husband, Richard Rubin, on behalf of the city of Southwest Ranches.

The 5-1 vote means that Wasserman-Rubin’s case must go through a lengthy and costly administrative hearing process, unless she and the commission can agree on a stiffer fine.

"A thousand dollars sounds to me like a slap on the wrist," said ethics commission member Charles Lydecker. "There’s a price to pay for a breach of ethical conduct."

He said the public would weigh the amount of the fine against what
Wasserman-Rubin’s husband earned from the grants. "folks look at it
(the fine) and say, ‘Think of the money they must have made.’^"

"She is a role model in the county,’" said Albert Massey, the ethics
panel’s chairman, himself a Broward resident. "She has got to adhere to
a very high standard… It’s too light a penalty for someone with her
experience and otherwise good

reputation."

Wasserman-Rubin’s lawyer, Mark Herron, said the commissioner voted
for the grants on the advice of a county attorney and that, as she said
in a sworn deposition, she did not know her husband stood to get
bonuses of $15,000 whether the grants were approved. "Not in her wildest
dreams" did Wasserman-Rubin know that her vote stood to benefit her
husband’s commerce, and she has no role whatsoever in her husband’s
company.

"His commerce is here. Her commerce is there," Herron testified.

Even the ethics panel’s newest member, Roy Rogers, a long-time
personal friend of Wasserman-Rubin and her husband, agreed with the
majority that the penalty was not harsh adequate. The rejection came
despite the strong recommendation of the advocate, or prosecutor, James
Peterson, that it was fair to both sides.

But Peterson heard the bigger data, loud and clear. "I can produce out
from the commission’s statements that we’re going to look for money in
these settlements," Peterson said. "I produce out you. You want me to come in
with higher amounts on these."

Wasserman-Rubin is a political fixture in Broward County. She is a
former member of the Broward School Board, and in 2006 her name was
floated as a possible running mate for Jim Davis, the Democratic
candidate for governor.

Original post by Steve Bousquet

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • DZone
  • ThisNext
  • MisterWong
  • Wists
  • BlinkList
  • Fark
  • Furl
  • Netscape
  • NewsVine
  • RawSugar
  • Reddit
  • Simpy
  • Spurl
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Technorati
Related Articles
  • Zero money for Zapata, ethics panel is urged
  • No voucher conflicts for TBRC members
  • A whack or a wrist slap?
  • USF St. Petersburg’s LaFollette to edit ethics compendium
  • Another ethics complaint against Sansom
  • No comments yet. Be the first.

    Leave a reply